Later this month [October], changes will come into force as part of the Employment Rights Act 2025.

The reforms will include a new statutory right for independent trade unions to request access to workplaces. Access may be physical, digital, or a combination of both, and may be used to meet, represent, recruit or organise workers, and to facilitate collective bargaining. The new right of access does not cover organising industrial action. Importantly, this new right is available even if the trade union is not currently recognised by the employer.

The changes will allow employers to negotiate the terms of access agreements with unions but, if terms cannot be agreed, the trade union will be able to apply to the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) for an order to access. If an employer fails to comply, the CAC can take steps to enable access to the workplace and impose financial penalties.

The Employment Rights Act 2025 makes several changes, including to the statutory trade union recognition process, significant reforms in relation to unfair dismissal, and severely limiting the rights of employers to rely upon “fire and rehire”.

At our upcoming HR Forum, we will discuss the raft of changes. Employment partner, Michael McNally, will also look at the practical steps employers can take to comply with the new legislation.

At the event, we will also cover the latest legal updates, an interactive workshop on the complex challenges that arise from handling disciplinary matters, as well as the ever-increasing problem of complex AI generated correspondence from employees.

To book your place on the full day event, email Jack Harrington on jack.harrington@pannonecorporate.com

Latest News

Chambers rankings 2027 – Pannone is a ‘Premier League’ law firm - Pannone Corporate

“The team has a forward-thinking approach, pays attention to detail and is able to deliver responses and strategies one step ahead.” On the back of ...

Read more...
First prosecution of an unregistered children’s home - Pannone Corporate

Catalyst Care Limited has become the first company to be successfully prosecuted by Ofsted for operating as an unregistered children’s home. The compan...

Read more...
Hillsborough Law – one step closer - Pannone Corporate

Calls for a ‘Hillsborough Law’ and increased accountability of public servants have been voiced for many years.  However, despite a number of indepe...

Read more...

View all posts

The majority of North West businesses will not make the COVID-19 vaccination mandatory within their organisation, despite the growing debate around ‘no jab, no job’.

As the Government considers plans to introduce COVID certification, as it continues to open up the UK economy, 83% of the region’s business and HR leaders confirmed that they don’t intend to force employees to take up the vaccine, before returning to the office.

In a survey conducted during our recent HR Forum, more than a third of respondents said that staff had indicated they would not take the vaccine, with ‘anti-vax’ beliefs being the biggest driver (50%). Medical reasons (40%) and race (10%) also accounted for the most common reasons why North West employees would refuse to be immunised. 

Adam Pavey, director and employment lawyer at Pannone Corporate, commented: “The issue of COVID vaccinations in the workplace is a highly complex one and a unique problem facing the region’s business and HR leaders. 

“There are a number of employment law implications arising from a mandated vaccine. The law as it currently stands does not give an employer an automatic right to vaccinate. In fact, an employer is not able to force any employee to undertake what is essentially a medical procedure.”

Under the current law, an employer would have to argue that requiring an employee to take a vaccination is a “reasonable instruction”.  If an employee fails to follow this, then it could give rise to a disciplinary issue which may ultimately lead to dismissal.

Pavey added: “Requiring employees to take a vaccine is not automatically a reasonable instruction. There is of course no case law on this point and the employment tribunals have yet to deal with this issue. However, whether the instruction is reasonable will likely depend upon the particular circumstances. For example, an employee who works in the care sector may be seen differently from somebody who is able to work from home.”

Pavey continued: “A mandatory workplace vaccine would undoubtedly give rise to complaints of discrimination. The science indicates that people with certain health issues may have an adverse reaction to the vaccine. It’s likely that many would be classed as disabled and so dismissal for a failure to vaccinate could amount to unlawful discrimination.”

 

Latest News

Chambers rankings 2027 – Pannone is a ‘Premier League’ law firm - Pannone Corporate

“The team has a forward-thinking approach, pays attention to detail and is able to deliver responses and strategies one step ahead.” On the back of ...

Read more...
First prosecution of an unregistered children’s home - Pannone Corporate

Catalyst Care Limited has become the first company to be successfully prosecuted by Ofsted for operating as an unregistered children’s home. The compan...

Read more...
Hillsborough Law – one step closer - Pannone Corporate

Calls for a ‘Hillsborough Law’ and increased accountability of public servants have been voiced for many years.  However, despite a number of indepe...

Read more...

View all posts